… Economic activity, considered
as a whole, is conceived in terms of particular operations with
limited ends. The mind generalizes by composing the aggregate of these operations. Economic science merely generalizes the isolated situation; it restricts its object to operations carried out with
a view to a limited end, that of economic man. It does not take
into consideration a play of energy that no particular end limits:
the play of living matter in general, involved in the movement of
light of which it is the result. On the surface of the globe, for
living matter in general, energy is always in excess; the question is
always posed in terms of extravagance. The choice is limited to
how the wealth is to be squandered. It is to the particular living
being, or to limited populations of living beings, that the problem of necessity presents itself. But man is not just the separate
being that contends with the living world and with other men
for his share of resources. The general movement of exudation
(of waste) of living matter impels him, and he cannot stop it; moreover, being at the summit, his sovereignty in the living world identifies him with this movement; it destines him, in a privileged
way, to that glorious operation, to useless consumption. If he
denies this, as he is constantly urged to do by the consciousness
of a necessity, of an indigence inherent in separate beings (which
are constantly short of resources, which are nothing but eternally
needy individuals), his denial does not alter the global movement
of energy in the least: the latter cannot accumulate limitlessly
in the productive forces; eventually, like a river into the sea, it is bound to escape us and be lost to us.
Incomprehension does not change the final outcome in the slightest. We can ignore or forget the fact that the ground we live on is little other than a field of multiple destructions. Our ignorance only has this incontestable effect: It causes us to undergo what we could bring about in our own way, if we understood. It deprives us of the choice of an exudation that might suit us. Above all, it consigns men and their works to catastrophic destructions. For if we do not have the force to destroy the surplus energy ourselves, it cannot be used, and, like an unbroken animal that cannot be trained, it is this energy that destroys us; it is we who pay the price of the inevitable explosion.
Georges Bataille, The Accursed Share Vol. 1 (1988: 22-3)
Incomprehension does not change the final outcome in the slightest. We can ignore or forget the fact that the ground we live on is little other than a field of multiple destructions. Our ignorance only has this incontestable effect: It causes us to undergo what we could bring about in our own way, if we understood. It deprives us of the choice of an exudation that might suit us. Above all, it consigns men and their works to catastrophic destructions. For if we do not have the force to destroy the surplus energy ourselves, it cannot be used, and, like an unbroken animal that cannot be trained, it is this energy that destroys us; it is we who pay the price of the inevitable explosion.